Mounting research suggests that herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), extending beyond its well-established role in causing cold sores. HSV-1 infection has been shown to induce multiple pathways intimately linked to AD development, including the NLRP3 and GSK-3 pathways, ultimately contributing to the emergence of AD-like pathologies.
HSV-1 activates the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway through a multi-tiered molecular cascade to drive the pathological progression of AD. This pathway is initiated by the specific binding of the C-terminal domain of the viral envelope glycoprotein gB to Toll-like receptors (TLR2/4) on the surface of host microglia, triggering NF-κB signaling to upregulate transcriptional expression of NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β. Following viral endocytosis, the capsid protein VP16 compromises lysosomal membrane integrity, leading to cytosolic leakage of cathepsin B (CatB), which cleaves the NACHT domain of NLRP3 to relieve its autoinhibited state. Concurrently, mitochondrial stress induced by viral replication causes a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and oxidatively damaged mitochondrial DNA directly binds to the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain of NLRP3. These events synergistically promote prion-like oligomerization of ASC and autoproteolytic activation of pro-caspase-1. Activated caspase-1 cleaves gasdermin D to form transmembrane pores, facilitating the release of mature IL-1β and IL-18. IL-1β upregulates transcription of β-secretase (BACE1) via the neuronal JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway, enhancing aberrant cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and elevating Aβ42 production rates. Meanwhile, IL-18 inhibits the function of the lysosomal V-ATPase complex in microglia through STAT3 phosphorylation at Tyr705, reducing Aβ degradation efficiency. This process establishes a positive feedback loop, whereby Aβ fibrils, through hydrophobic interactions with the LRR domain of NLRP3, further stabilize the inflammasome complex, resulting in a self-perpetuating cycle of neuroinflammation and exacerbated amyloid deposition.
HSV-1 also exacerbates AD pathogenesis by activating the GSK-3 pathway, a serine/threonine kinase integral to diverse cellular processes. Following neuronal infection, the viral capsid protein VP16 induces dysregulated intracellular Ca²⁺ signaling, triggering GSK-3β activation. Activated GSK-3β phosphorylates APP, enhancing its affinity for β-secretase (BACE1) and shifting APP processing toward the amyloidogenic pathway. This results in elevated extracellular Aβ production and accumulation of neurotoxic APP C-terminal fragments. Concurrently, GSK-3 activation drives tau hyperphosphorylation and aberrant nuclear aggregation, which disrupts chromatin remodeling and suppresses DNA repair gene expression. Furthermore, HSV-1 inhibits autophagosome-lysosome fusion, impairing Aβ clearance and sustaining intracellular Aβ aggregates in infected primary hippocampal neurons. Notably, Aβ exhibits dual roles in viral pathogenesis: while Aβ oligomers entrap HSV-1 particles to limit viral spread, viral glycoprotein B reciprocally accelerates Aβ fibrillization, establishing a self-reinforcing cycle of viral persistence and amyloid deposition.
The pathological features of AD induced by HSV-1 infection are similar to those of classical AD, including:
Given the potential role of HSV-1 in the pathogenesis of AD, researchers are actively exploring various therapeutic strategies centered on anti-herpetic drugs.
Researchers are also exploring innovative strategies such as targeting HSV-1 neuroinvasiveness and using CRISPR-Cas9 systems to target the HSV-1 genome in infected cells. These approaches represent promising but still experimental avenues for future therapeutic interventions. Targeting neuroinvasiveness aims to prevent the virus from entering the brain, while CRISPR-Cas9 holds the potential to eliminate the virus from latently infected cells. While these methods hold great potential, they are in the early stages of development, and significant safety and efficacy issues need to be addressed.
In summary, therapeutic strategies targeting HSV-1 offer a potential direction for intervention in AD. While the clinical effectiveness of existing antiviral drugs has been limited, the exploration of novel agents and innovative approaches continues to advance, offering hope for more effective treatments for AD patients in the future.
Reference